Section 12: Cruel & Unusual Punishment
R. v. Lloyd, [2016] 1 SCR 130
The Controlled Drugs and Substances Act imposed a one-year mandatory minimum sentence for possession for the purpose of trafficking in circumstances where the accused had been convicted of a trafficking-related offence in the previous ten years. Continue reading
R. v. Nur, 2015 SCC 15
The Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Nur considers the constitutionality of a three-year mandatory minimum sentence for unlicensed possession of a loaded firearm. Continue reading
R. v. Lewis, 2012 ONCJ 413
In R. v. Lewis, Justice Bellefontaine of the Ontario Court of Justice applied the precedent-setting decision in R. v. Smickle, to strike down a three-year mandatory minimum sentence for “trafficking” in firearms. Continue reading
R. v. Smickle, 2012 ONSC 602
Mr. Smickle was convicted of possession of a loaded firearm, contrary to Section 95(1) of the Criminal Code, which carries a mandatory minimum sentence of three years’ incarceration. The Charter issue was raised on sentencing, and concerned the issue of whether three years’ incarceration was “cruel and unusual punishment” given the circumstances of Mr. Smickle’s offence. Continue reading
Canadian Foundation for Children, Youth & the Law v. Canada (Attorney General), [2004] 1 S.C.R. 76
The Canadian Foundation for Children, Youth & the Law, a childrens’ rights organization, brought an action for declaratory relief striking down Section 43 of the Criminal Code, the legislation which decriminalizes the spanking of children for the purpose of corrective discipline. Continue reading